| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Stop wasting time looking for files and revisions. Connect your Gmail, DriveDropbox, and Slack accounts and in less than 2 minutes, Dokkio will automatically organize all your file attachments. Learn more and claim your free account.

View
 

Law 19 - Jordan

Page history last edited by abogado 7 years, 3 months ago

SLO REPT

 

Course

LAW 019 - Property and Creditor Rights

SLO

Students will demonstrate appropriate application  of ethics in legal matters

Related Institutional Learning Outcome(s)

1) Written and Oral Communication
Students will demonstrate the interactive nature of communication involving speaking, writing, listening and reading. Evidence will be the student’s ability to make a clear, well-organized verbal presentation employing appropriate evidence to support the arguments or conclusions and to write a clear, well-organized paper using documentation and quantitative tools when appropriate.
6) Ethics and Values applied to decision-making
Students will demonstrate facility in making value judgments and ethical decisions by analyzing and formulating the value foundation/framework of a specific area of knowledge in its theory and practice or in a professional context. Evidence will be the ability to identify own values, infer and analyze values in artistic and humanistic works as well as scientific and technological developments and to engage in values-inflected and ethical decision-making in multiple contexts.

Assessment Information

Year/Semester Section Class SIze Sample Size Assessment Method Evaluation Instrument
Spring 2013 0324 34 11 Case Study Rubric

Assessment Description - Elaborate on the details of the assessment method. (e.g. length, Time in semester, Type, etc.)

The Law Discipline has decided to assess the ethics cases study one more time but to use a new rubric based on critical thinking principles and then to compare with the last assessment in Spring 2012

Assessed By:
Jordan, David C. 6/25/2013

Assessment Results

  Good
10.00 pts.
Fair
5.00 pts.
Poor
2.00 pts.
Clarity
Good
Student elaborates on the application of the appropriate ethical principles to solve the ethics case study
Fair
Student partially elaborates on the application of the appropriate ethical principles to solve the ethics case study
Poor
Student does not elaborate on the application of the appropriate ethical principles to solve the ethics case study
8.6 (86 %)
Accuracy
Good
Student is accurate in the selection of the correct ethical principle to apply in solving the ethics case study
Fair
Student is somewhat accurate in the selection of the correct ethical principle to apply in solving the ethics case study
Poor
Student is inaccurate in the selection of the correct ethical principle to apply in solving the ethics case study
9.1 (91 %)
Relevance
Good
Student provides analysis that is relevant to the solution of the ethics case study
Fair
Student provides some analysis that is relevant to the solution of the ethics case study
Poor
Student provides little or analysis that is relevant to the solution of the ethics case study
9.1 (91 %)
Depth
Good
Student is able to grasp and discuss the complexities and difficulties of the ethics case study.
Fair
Student is able to grasp and discuss some of the complexities and difficulties of the ethics case study.
Poor
Student is unable able to grasp and discuss any of the complexities and difficulties of the ethics case study.
9.1 (91 %)
Rubric Score: 90 %

Assessment Analysis

Again the assessment in spring 2013 outstripped the one in Spring 2012, 90% vs. 81% or a net gain of 9%. The students perform better in each instance when they are required to read and re-read, and then apply materials on ethics and critical thinking. See below materials which each semester students must read, and discuss and apply. This is the main reason all of the assessments have improved in our ethics study case.

Curriculum Modifications

Curriculum Modifications Planned? NO


Resource Requests

Any Resource Requests? NO


Supplemental Files

 File NameDescriptionUploaded
ethics-materials.pdf  
6/25/2013

Instructions for importing into Microsoft Word:
  1. Select All text by holding the "Control" key while clicking the "A" key (CTRL-A).
  2. Copy the text by holding the "Control" key while clicking the "C" key (CTRL-C).
  3. Open Microsoft Word. Then paste the contents by holding the "Control" key while pressing the "V" key (CTRL-V)
  4. Save the Microsoft Word Document.

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.