| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

SLO-ETHICS

Page history last edited by abogado 10 years, 6 months ago

SLO Ethics 2

 

SLO REPT

SLO ETHICS Spring 2012

Spring 2012 Assessment Report

Sprint 2013 Assessment Report

ethics-materials

 

 

Ethics Case Study

Class Section  Assessment 
Law 1  3237  37% 
Law 2  0322  85% 
Law 10  3239  76% 
Law 11  0324  74% 
Law 12  0325  85% 
Law 13  0326  75% 
Law 16  0327  85% 
Law 17 0322  80% 
Law 18 0329  76% 
Law 19 3241  81% 
Law 20 0332  82% 
Law 34 0331  88% 
Summary Average 79% 

Spring 2012 Assessment Report

Spring 2013 Assessment Report

Analysis:

 

The students were given a case study, along with supporting materials (ethical theories, powerpoint, and grading rubric) which required the appropriate application of ethics which is one of our law Program Learning Outcomes.

The case study required students to learn five theories of ethics, and then to apply the theories to an ethical dilemma as set forth in a case study.

Results/Analysis:

All 12 classes in our law program were assessed during the  Spring 2012 semester. The students did fairly well with the case study (see above % for each class, and overall average (79%).   Both briefing of law cases and this ethics case study require students to perform 4 steps as follows:

1. Clearly define the legal or ethical principle (articulation of the substantive law or ethical principle is essential).

2. Spot the legal issue of ethical dilemma (similar to a doctor diagnosing the correct illness given many symptoms)

3. Fully discuss each relevant fact and demonstrate how it impacts the case law or ethics case study.

4. Arrive at a conclusion - demonstrate a full understanding and application of the legal or ethical principle, be able to understand the public policies involved, the legal rationale for the decision, and in the ethics case, propose alternative solutions which help to resolve the dilemma while balancing the competing interests of the parties.

Assessment of the ethics case study reveals that students seem to handle steps 2 and 4 fairly well (spot the issue, arrive at a conclusion), but a common mistake amongst all of our students is to gloss over, overlook, or fail to handle steps 1 and 3 (clearly define terms, and fully discuss the relevant facts in a law case or ethics case study).

 Suggested resolutions:

During the Spring 2012 semester the law faculty will discuss some of the below possible solutions to improve our students' failure to clearly define terms and discuss relevant facts.

 

  • infuse more ethics case studies, definitions, theories, and practice identifying and resolving ethics dilemmas throughout our discipline and program

  • draft a different case study with a model answer for every semester which can then be used as extra credit for students at the end of the semester, and continue to assess the ethics case study approach

  • better craft "instructions for class assignments, projects, case law briefings, etc. and stress the importance of following instructions carefully in each class

  • create a youtube video (possibly humorous) showing how not following instructions ends in bad results

  • instruct students to remove the use of personal opinions and supplant them with supported and substantiated legal arguments

  • develop strategies, best practices and new pedagogy to assist instructing students on how to better balance the competing interests and policies between disputing parties

  • increase possible internship/job shadowing "hands on" experience for students to gain "real life experience" in the resolution of disputes and ethical dilemmas

  • look for good academic pedagogy, perhaps in the sciences, to infuse a more "objective" fact based analysis

  • work on developing best practices in teaching analysis which apply equally to case law briefing, and ethics case studies

  • explore alternative types of assignments which engage students more fully. one might be group projects with use of interesting, dynamic case studies which require more innovative thinking and analysis

  • possibly develop a separate law class in ethics and add it to our paralegal curriculum

  • create a Spring Ethics Composuim or Forum between several disciplines - i.e." Interdisciplinary Ethics Forum"  (Administration of Justice, History, Psychology, Sociology, other Social Sciences, Humanities and Liberal Arts instructors, courses, and disciplines, etc.) and to argue pro and con a "hot issue of the day"

  • develop more assignments and projects which are "problem solving" and which require more "open ended" thinking and analysis, such as finding cases given a "sparse set of facts", "searching to find solutions" type of assignment  

  • find a simple "formula" we can follow to develop more student engagement, and develop more "search and problem solving" oriented assignments.

     

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.