//
//
LAMC Unit Effectiveness Review: (LAW)
2009 - Open for Assessment
|
| Student Success - Successful Course Completion |
Save & Exit |
Data Description
Student Success
| Year/Semester |
Day |
Evening |
Weekend |
Online |
Total |
% Change in Total |
College Avg. |
| Fall 2004 |
75.0 % |
67.6 % |
0.0 % |
71.9 % |
71.0 % |
0.0 % |
67.3 % |
| Spring 2005 |
61.5 % |
78.6 % |
76.5 % |
70.6 % |
71.5 % |
0.8 % |
66.5 % |
| Fall 2005 |
64.3 % |
83.0 % |
82.4 % |
69.1 % |
71.1 % |
-0.6 % |
65.9 % |
| Spring 2006 |
0.0 % |
80.0 % |
54.5 % |
65.9 % |
67.0 % |
-5.8 % |
65.3 % |
| Fall 2006 |
0.0 % |
62.5 % |
78.3 % |
68.2 % |
68.3 % |
1.9 % |
64.6 % |
| Spring 2007 |
0.0 % |
57.8 % |
75.0 % |
61.4 % |
61.2 % |
-10.4 % |
63.7 % |
| Fall 2007 |
66.7 % |
71.0 % |
81.3 % |
70.7 % |
71.2 % |
16.3 % |
63.9 % |
| Spring 2008 |
0.0 % |
60.4 % |
0.0 % |
66.5 % |
65.4 % |
-8.2 % |
63.7 % |
| Fall 2008 |
0.0 % |
64.4 % |
0.0 % |
73.5 % |
71.9 % |
10.1 % |
63.1 % |
| Spring 2009 |
0.0 % |
62.2 % |
59.1 % |
68.3 % |
67.1 % |
-6.8 % |
63.7 % |
Grade Distribution
| Year/Semester |
A |
B |
C |
D |
F |
I |
W |
P |
N |
X |
| Fall 2004 |
46.0 % |
13.6 % |
11.4 % |
3.3 % |
10.0 % |
0.0 % |
15.7 % |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
| Spring 2005 |
45.2 % |
16.1 % |
10.2 % |
2.5 % |
10.6 % |
0.8 % |
14.4 % |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
| Fall 2005 |
44.0 % |
13.7 % |
13.4 % |
2.5 % |
5.2 % |
1.0 % |
20.1 % |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
| Spring 2006 |
41.5 % |
15.5 % |
10.1 % |
4.7 % |
12.3 % |
0.7 % |
15.2 % |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
| Fall 2006 |
40.0 % |
18.0 % |
10.4 % |
2.4 % |
10.6 % |
1.4 % |
17.3 % |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
| Spring 2007 |
37.0 % |
14.5 % |
9.8 % |
2.0 % |
9.3 % |
2.3 % |
25.2 % |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
| Fall 2007 |
47.0 % |
14.6 % |
9.6 % |
3.3 % |
9.4 % |
1.0 % |
15.0 % |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
| Spring 2008 |
45.6 % |
11.9 % |
7.6 % |
4.5 % |
11.9 % |
0.4 % |
17.9 % |
0.2 % |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
| Fall 2008 |
45.0 % |
16.8 % |
10.2 % |
3.6 % |
4.3 % |
0.2 % |
20.0 % |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
| Spring 2009 |
38.6 % |
15.7 % |
12.8 % |
3.1 % |
12.2 % |
0.8 % |
16.9 % |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
0.0 % |
Student Retention
| Year/Semester |
Retention |
| Fall 2004 |
84.3 % |
| Spring 2005 |
85.6 % |
| Fall 2005 |
79.9 % |
| Spring 2006 |
84.8 % |
| Fall 2006 |
82.7 % |
| Spring 2007 |
74.8 % |
| Fall 2007 |
85.0 % |
| Spring 2008 |
82.1 % |
| Fall 2008 |
80.0 % |
| Spring 2009 |
83.1 % |
+ Show Detailed Breakdown Graphs
| Data Review and Analysis for Student Success |
Respondent(s)
Analyze trends in Student Success over the period for which data were provided, using detailed breakdowns as necessary. Where college-wide data is provided, compare discipline to college-wide trends. Also, discuss college-wide or discipline-department specific factors as they relate to these trends and note the implications on your discipline/department operations or planning.
The Paralegal Program Student Success is higher than the college average. Because of our excellent online program, excellent online faculty and paralegal tutors, we have been able to maintain a high success rate for our online program. Also we will plan on having more classes on Friday and Saturdays since the success rate for those classes is almost 10 percent higher than our other classes.
Validation Team Response
| Was a trend analysis done? |
Yes
No
|
| Was a comparative analysis done? |
Yes
No
|
| Was a detailed analysis done? |
Yes
No
|
| Data Evaluation: |
Accepted
Return to Unit for Review
|
Comments:
|
|
| Unit Plan for Student Success |
Based on your evaluation, what objectives or initiatives would you develop to improve your discipline/program?
| Objective |
Individual |
Begin |
End |
Priority |
Status |
|
| integrate paralegal tutors in both online and oncampus classes |
David Jordan |
9/1/2008 |
12/1/2012 |
High |
In-Progress |
Modify |
|
|
|
//
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.