| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

the following words and statements in the case-past consideration

Page history last edited by abogado 8 years, 6 months ago

Chapter 13 case problem - Past Consideration

 

Read  Access Organics v Hernandez 

 

The explain the following statements in your answer

 

  • Explain the following: The non-compete agreement provided in relevant part: For good consideration and as an inducement for Access Organics (the Company) to employ Andy Hernandez, the undersigned Employee hereby agrees not to directly or indirectly compete with the business of the Company and it successors and assigns during the period of employment and for a period of two years following termination of employment . . . .
  • Explain the following - the District Court granted the temporary restraining order, which stated: "Defendants are restrained from owning, operating, and managing any business engaged in the same business as Access Organics, Inc
  • Explain the following - Access Organics contends that Hernandez's salary and continued employment supplied sufficient consideration. Section 28-2-801, MCA, provides that "[a]ny benefit conferred or agreed to be conferred upon the promisor by any other person, to which the promisor is not lawfully entitled, or any prejudice suffered or agreed to be suffered by such person, other than such as he is at the time of consent lawfully bound to suffer, as an inducement to the promisor is a good consideration for a promise."
  • Explain the following - Consideration exists if the employee enters into the non-compete agreement at the time of hiring. During pre-employment negotiations, the employee and the employer engage in a bargained-for exchange: the employer obtains the desired non-compete agreement, and in return, the employee receives employment
  • Explain the following - However, Hernandez signed the agreement more than four months after accepting his initial employment offer from Access Organics. The record clearly shows that the agreement was not signed as part of Access Organics's pre-employment negotiations with Hernandez
  • Explain the following - A noncompete agreement entered into after employment will be enforced if it is supported by independent consideration . . . . Independent, additional, consideration is required for the valid formation of a modification or subsequent agreement.
  • Explain the following - We conclude that the District Court erred by finding that the "continuation of Defendants' employment, and therefore, income" sufficed as consideration. We hold that Access Organics failed to meet its burden of proof by showing that the agreement was supported by good consideratio
  • Explain who won the case (actual name) and give a conclusion 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.