SLO REPT
Top of Form
Course
LAW 012 - Tort Law and Claims Investigation – Manny Rose, Spring 2013
SLO
Students will demonstrate appropriate application of ethics in legal matters
Related Institutional Learning Outcome(s)
|
1) Written and Oral Communication
|
|
Students will demonstrate the interactive nature of communication involving speaking, writing, listening and reading. Evidence will be the student’s ability to make a clear, well-organized verbal presentation employing appropriate evidence to support the arguments or conclusions and to write a clear, well-organized paper using documentation and quantitative tools when appropriate.
|
|
|
6) Ethics and Values applied to decision-making
|
|
Students will demonstrate facility in making value judgments and ethical decisions by analyzing and formulating the value foundation/framework of a specific area of knowledge in its theory and practice or in a professional context. Evidence will be the ability to identify own values, infer and analyze values in artistic and humanistic works as well as scientific and technological developments and to engage in values-inflected and ethical decision-making in multiple contexts.
|
|
Assessment Information
|
Year/Semester
|
Section
|
Class SIze
|
Sample Size
|
Assessment Method
|
Evaluation Instrument
|
|
Spring 2013
|
0319
|
36
|
12
|
Case Study
|
Rubric
|
|
Assessment Description - Elaborate on the details of the assessment method. (e.g. length, Time in semester, Type, etc.)
Extra credit ethics assignment imbedded at the end of the semester, and which was assessed in Spring 2012. An updated rubric based on criticalthinking.org principles will be used, and then compared with previous assessment.
|
|
Assessed By: Rose, Emannuel 6/24/2013
|
Assessment Results
|
|
Good
10.00 pts.
|
Fair
5.00 pts.
|
Poor
2.00 pts.
|
|
Clarity
|
Good
Student elaborates on the application of the appropriate ethical principles to solve the ethics case study
|
Fair
Student partially elaborates on the application of the appropriate ethical principles to solve the ethics case study
|
Poor
Student does not elaborate on the application of the appropriate ethical principles to solve the ethics case study
|
9.2 (92 %)
|
|
Accuracy
|
Good
Student is accurate in the selection of the correct ethical principle to apply in solving the ethics case study
|
Fair
Student is somewhat accurate in the selection of the correct ethical principle to apply in solving the ethics case study
|
Poor
Student is inaccurate in the selection of the correct ethical principle to apply in solving the ethics case study
|
8.1 (81 %)
|
|
Relevance
|
Good
Student provides analysis that is relevant to the solution of the ethics case study
|
Fair
Student provides some analysis that is relevant to the solution of the ethics case study
|
Poor
Student provides little or analysis that is relevant to the solution of the ethics case study
|
8.5 (85 %)
|
|
Depth
|
Good
Student is able to grasp and discuss the complexities and difficulties of the ethics case study.
|
Fair
Student is able to grasp and discuss some of the complexities and difficulties of the ethics case study.
|
Poor
Student is unable able to grasp and discuss any of the complexities and difficulties of the ethics case study.
|
8.5 (85 %)
|
Rubric Score: 86 %
Assessment Analysis
Students did well with all of the criteria of analysis. The assessment of the same ethics case study in Spring 2012 for Law 12 was 82%, and thus the assessment did not result in an appreciable difference. No modifications suggested at this time.
Curriculum Modifications
Curriculum Modifications Planned? NO
Resource Requests
Any Resource Requests? NO
Supplemental Files
|
No File(s) have been uploaded for this assessment.
|
Bottom of Form
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.