|
Law 1 - David Jordan
Page history
last edited
by abogado 10 years, 10 months ago
SLO REPT
SLO
Students will demonstrate appropriate application of ethics in legal matters
Related Institutional Learning Outcome(s)
1) Written and Oral Communication |
Students will demonstrate the interactive nature of communication involving speaking, writing, listening and reading. Evidence will be the student’s ability to make a clear, well-organized verbal presentation employing appropriate evidence to support the arguments or conclusions and to write a clear, well-organized paper using documentation and quantitative tools when appropriate. |
|
6) Ethics and Values applied to decision-making |
Students will demonstrate facility in making value judgments and ethical decisions by analyzing and formulating the value foundation/framework of a specific area of knowledge in its theory and practice or in a professional context. Evidence will be the ability to identify own values, infer and analyze values in artistic and humanistic works as well as scientific and technological developments and to engage in values-inflected and ethical decision-making in multiple contexts. |
|
Assessment Information
Year/Semester |
Section |
Class SIze |
Sample Size |
Assessment Method |
Evaluation Instrument |
Spring 2013 |
3301 |
59 |
20 |
Case Study |
Rubric |
Assessment Description - Elaborate on the details of the assessment method. (e.g. length, Time in semester, Type, etc.)
The Law Discipline has decided to assess the ethics cases study one more time but to use a new rubric based on critical thinking principles and then to compare with the last assessment in Spring 2012 |
Assessed By: Jordan, David C. 6/25/2013 |
Assessment Results
|
Good 10.00 pts. |
Fair 5.00 pts. |
Poor 2.00 pts. |
Clarity |
Good
Student elaborates on the application of the appropriate ethical principles to solve the ethics case study |
Fair
Student partially elaborates on the application of the appropriate ethical principles to solve the ethics case study |
Poor
Student does not elaborate on the application of the appropriate ethical principles to solve the ethics case study |
7.8 (78 %) |
Accuracy |
Good
Student is accurate in the selection of the correct ethical principle to apply in solving the ethics case study |
Fair
Student is somewhat accurate in the selection of the correct ethical principle to apply in solving the ethics case study |
Poor
Student is inaccurate in the selection of the correct ethical principle to apply in solving the ethics case study |
7.1 (71 %) |
Relevance |
Good
Student provides analysis that is relevant to the solution of the ethics case study |
Fair
Student provides some analysis that is relevant to the solution of the ethics case study |
Poor
Student provides little or analysis that is relevant to the solution of the ethics case study |
7.5 (75 %) |
Depth |
Good
Student is able to grasp and discuss the complexities and difficulties of the ethics case study. |
Fair
Student is able to grasp and discuss some of the complexities and difficulties of the ethics case study. |
Poor
Student is unable able to grasp and discuss any of the complexities and difficulties of the ethics case study. |
8.0 (80 %) |
Rubric Score: 76 %
Assessment Analysis
The students in Bus. Law 1 assessed at a very low 37% in our last assessment in Spring 2012. This could be attributed to the newness of the exercise, and lack of providing content and information at the beginning of the class to assist students with the skills necessary. This semester, Spring 2013, the students improved markedly to 75%, and were much more clear, accurate, relevant and in depth with their answers.
Curriculum Modifications
Curriculum Modifications Planned? NO
Resource Requests
Any Resource Requests? NO
Law 1 - David Jordan
|
Tip: To turn text into a link, highlight the text, then click on a page or file from the list above.
|
|
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.